The number of minims in “seruants,” the lack of a any indication of a suspension mark, and the lack of the finishing stroke on the leftmost minim on the remnant of the fourth letter indicates that this is the intended spelling. Likewise, the rightmost minim of the third letter of the second word indicates that this should be “saue” rather than “save,” which is consistent with scribe’s decisions between the two in the rest of the chapel. Additionally, slight remnants of the terminal “d” and the unique descender of the “r” in the “or” ligature in the word “lord” can be seen, making it likely “olord” rather than the two words separately. See “hosell” at the bottom of the panel for an example of how the scribe connects “o” to letters with tall ascenders. ↩

While the “or” in “for” is largely missing, enough of the ligature remains to make it clear this is the intended word. Likewise, the initial “o” in “oure” is missing, but the remaining partial minims indicate that is the intended word. Unfortunately, a portion of the panel has been cut out and what remains is insufficient to determine spelling or placement of words in the missing section. ↩

The final word in this line is significantly damaged, but enough remains – the top portion of the initial “w,” the “o”, the tops of both “d’s”, and the tittle for the “i” between them – to determine that “woundid” is the intended word here. ↩